Applied AI, engineered for production.

Cybernip is an AI and machine learning consultancy. We design, build and operate generative AI and agentic systems on AWS and Azure, and we engineer inference on AWS Silicon.

Current work:
Work stays in your cloud accountWe build inside your AWS or Azure tenancy, under your IAM and in your region.
Named engineers, start to finishThe people in the first meeting are the people who ship the system.
Fixed scope, written outcomesEvery engagement ends with a document you can hand to your board or your auditor.
Two legal entities, one teamCybernip México and Cybernip, LLC. Contract with the one that fits your jurisdiction.
01Capabilities

Four disciplines. One accountable team.

The same engineers take a system from the first model call to audited production. Nothing is handed to a different team halfway through.

Generative AI systems

Retrieval, generation and orchestration built around your data and your constraints. We choose models by running them against your evaluation set, and we put cost controls and observability in place before the first release rather than after the first incident.

  • Architecture and model evaluation
  • Retrieval and knowledge systems
  • Fine-tuning and custom models
  • Guardrails, privacy and data residency

Agentic systems

Agents that act inside your ERP, CRM and ticketing systems with explicit permissions and a full trace of every step. Where a managed harness fits, we use it. Where it does not, we write the orchestration ourselves.

  • Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Strands Agents
  • Azure AI Foundry and Microsoft Agent Framework
  • MCP and A2A interoperability
  • Evaluation, optimisation and red-teaming

AI infrastructure and Silicon

Training and inference engineering on AWS Trainium and Inferentia with the Neuron SDK, next to the GPU estates that still make sense. We measure price-performance on your workload instead of quoting a vendor slide.

  • Trainium3, Trainium2 and Inferentia2
  • Neuron compilation and distributed serving
  • Capacity planning and cost modelling
  • SageMaker, EKS and Bedrock custom model import

Trust, identity and PKI

Cybernip started in digital identity and certification for high-assurance sectors. We bring that to AI: identities for agents and tools, signed and attributable actions, and audit trails a regulator will accept.

  • Private certificate authorities and lifecycle
  • Agent and workload identity, mTLS
  • Digital signatures and verifiable records
  • Security architecture for AI systems
03Generative AI

Every agent run, visible to the step.

This is how we look at an agent in production: each tool call, each model call, how long it took and what it cost. If we cannot show you this view, we have not finished the work.

trace a4f1…reconciliation agent on Bedrock AgentCore
plan412 ms
get_invoice640 ms
get_purchase_order790 ms
compare_lines1.42 s
policy_check550 ms
flag_for_review360 ms
respond910 ms
total 4.6 stokens 6,118cost $0.0113outcome routed to human

What we are putting into production this quarter

The platforms moved a long way in twelve months. These are the pieces we are deploying for clients now, not ideas we are watching from a distance.

Managed agent harnesses

Orchestration loops with isolated sessions, persistent state and exportable code. A prototype becomes a system without a rewrite.

Bedrock AgentCore harness · Strands Agent Harness SDK

Agent evaluation and optimisation

Trace-driven evaluation, batch scoring and A/B tests against your own data, in whichever framework your team already uses.

AgentCore Evaluations · custom judges and golden sets

Long-running, governed agents

Agents that run multi-day jobs on dedicated compute, registered centrally, with permissions scoped per tool.

AgentCore Runtime instances · Agent Registry

Open interoperability

Tools exposed over the Model Context Protocol and agents talking over A2A, so you are never locked to one vendor's loop.

MCP · A2A · gateway and identity

Model choice by evidence

Claude, Amazon Nova, OpenAI and open-weight models tested side by side on Bedrock or Azure AI Foundry, with routing and fallback designed in.

Amazon Bedrock · Azure AI Foundry

Custom and domain models

Fine-tuning, distillation and custom pre-training where general models fall short, served on the silicon that makes the economics work.

Nova Forge · Neuron on Trainium
Substrate
Interposer and NeuronLink
HBM stacks
NeuronCores
Heat spreader

Drag to rotate. Hover or tap to separate the layers.

04AWS Silicon

A dedicated practice for Trainium and Inferentia.

Inference is now the largest line in most AI budgets. AWS designs the accelerator, the interconnect and the compiler together. We specialise in moving real workloads onto that stack, and in telling you plainly when a workload should stay where it is.

  • Trainium3Third-generation accelerator and rack-scale Trn3 UltraServers. AWS positions it at up to four times the performance of the previous generation with large energy and cost gains. Our reference target for new deployments.
  • Trainium2Trn2 instances and 64-chip UltraServers over NeuronLink. Mature and widely available. Most Bedrock token volume already runs on Trainium.
  • Inferentia2High-throughput, cost-sensitive inference. Usually the right home for embeddings, rerankers and the smaller models behind agent workflows.
  • Neuron SDKPyTorch and JAX front-ends, NeuronX Distributed for sharding, vLLM for serving. This is where the actual engineering happens.

Not every model belongs on Neuron. Unsupported operators, very small batches or a weekly retraining cycle can still favour GPUs. We benchmark first and show you the numbers either way.

What a benchmark report looks like

Before anyone migrates anything, we run the same prompts and the same traffic shape on both platforms and write the result down. Sometimes the candidate wins on cost and loses on latency, as in this sample. That trade-off is yours to make, with real numbers in front of you.

Benchmark report (sample, synthetic data)GPU baselineTrainium2 candidate
Cost per 1M output tokenslower is better
$1.00
$0.61
Throughputtokens per second, higher is better
1,640
2,010
p95 latencytime to first token, lower is better
380 ms
510 ms
Quality paritypass rate on your evaluation suite
94.1%
93.6%
Illustrative values only. Your report uses your prompts, your traffic and your evaluation suite.

Migration method

Profile

Cost per million tokens, p95 latency and utilisation on the current estate. This baseline is what every later decision refers to.

Compile

Port with Neuron, fix unsupported operators, shard with NeuronX Distributed. Most problems appear here, which is where we want them.

Benchmark

Identical prompts and traffic shape, side by side. Throughput, cost per token and quality parity against your evaluation suite.

Transition

Canary a slice of traffic on SageMaker or EKS, watch the traces, then move the rest. GPU capacity goes back to the workloads that need it.

05Engagement

Engineers embedded with your teams.

Our engineers work in your environment, under your access policies, next to your people, until the system runs and your team can operate it without us.

Two to four weeks

Assessment

A rigorous review of one candidate workload or an existing AI system: architecture, data readiness, cost model, risk, and a plan in priority order.

  • Architecture and model evaluation
  • Silicon price-performance study
  • Security and governance review
  • Written recommendation and roadmap
Six to twelve weeks

Build

Fixed-scope delivery of a production system: the agent or generative workflow, its evaluation suite, guardrails, identity and observability, deployed in your cloud account.

  • Evaluation cases agreed before we build
  • Production deployment in your tenancy
  • Runbooks and training for your operators
  • Full handover to your engineers
Ongoing

Operate

A standing engineering team for organisations running several AI systems: continuous evaluation, model and silicon migrations, cost management and incident response.

  • Named engineers, monthly cadence
  • Model and platform migrations
  • Cost and capacity governance
  • Thirty days' notice to end
06How we work

Commitments we put in writing.

These appear in every statement of work we sign. They are the reason clients in regulated sectors are comfortable letting us into their systems.

  1. Your data does not leave your tenancy

    We work inside your AWS or Azure account, in your region, under IAM roles you grant and can revoke. We do not copy data to our own systems to work on it.

  2. Every recommendation comes with the evidence

    Model, platform and silicon choices are backed by benchmarks you can rerun yourself. If we cannot measure something on your workload, we say so.

  3. No surprises on scope or price

    Assessment and Build engagements are fixed in scope and price before they start. Changes are agreed in writing, never discovered on an invoice.

  4. Your team owns the result

    Code, infrastructure definitions, evaluation sets and runbooks are handed over in full. We train your engineers to operate the system, and to replace us if they choose to.

  5. Security and confidentiality by default

    NDAs as standard, background-checked engineers, least-privilege access and a written security review in every build. Our PKI background means we take identity and attribution seriously.

07Industries

Where correctness and cost both matter.

We do our best work in regulated and operationally complex environments, where an agent's mistake has a real cost and the inference bill is reviewed by someone in finance.

  • Advanced manufacturingProcess models for SMT and electronics assembly, predictive quality and setpoint recommendation, built with the plant's own approved records.
  • Financial servicesDocument intelligence, reconciliation agents, model risk and auditability under supervisory expectations.
  • Public sector and defenceIdentity, certification and analytics for high-assurance operations. Sovereign and air-gapped deployment patterns.
  • Logistics and supply chainAgents over ERP and TMS data for exceptions, planning and cross-border customs documentation.
  • Energy and utilitiesInspection analytics, maintenance knowledge systems and inference in region or at the edge.
  • Retail and consumerCatalogue, service and demand systems where cost per interaction decides whether AI scales at all.
08Company

Independent, senior and accountable.

Cybernip is an independent consultancy with engineering in Guadalajara, headquarters in Mexico City and a US office in Houston. The firm began in digital identity and certification for high-assurance sectors, moved into data engineering, and over the last two years has concentrated on applied AI: generative systems, agents and the silicon they run on.

We are platform-literate and vendor-neutral. We are a member of the AWS Partner Network and a Microsoft AI Cloud Partner. Recommendations come from evidence on your workloads, and we will tell you when a platform, a model or a chip is the wrong choice for you.

Two legal entities serve clients across the Americas. Both work to the same engineering standards and the same confidentiality terms, with the same people.

Read our governance principles

Cybernip México S.A.S. de C.V.

Mexico City and Guadalajara. Serves clients in Mexico and Latin America.

Governed byMexican law, LFPDPPPBillingMXN or USDContact[email protected]
Cybernip, LLC

Houston, Texas. Serves clients in the United States and international clients who prefer a US counterparty.

Governed byTexas, United StatesBillingUSDContact[email protected]
09Contact

Start with a conversation.

Tell us about the workload, the platform you are on and what a good outcome looks like. A senior engineer, not a salesperson, replies within two working days.

[email protected]
Mexico CityHeadquarters
GuadalajaraEngineering
HoustonUnited States
We use your details only to reply to this enquiry.